American Literature

Richard Feynman is a genuine man, enthusiastic with teaching and self-discovery. He is an example of a person who creates great things. Philosophical questions never had the slightest appeal to him (as well as religion). Thus, he was considered as purely scientist, dismissing anything about life that was not reachable by scientific method. He did an admirable work of fighting pseudo-science and paranormal fraud by putting an ordinary religious belief into metaphysical question. Aside from that, he was also known for in his community as a curious character, in the sense, of being a man of curiosity. In this regard, he was considered as one of the important physicist during his time (1918-1988) and of the 20th century.
   
In some cases, the Feynman theory became the center of scientific debate - the idea modern knowledge as a collective enterprise. He tried to keep up with his field and suppressed his own sources of inspiration with his solitary questions and examinations. This is said to be the fortune of the most restraint to make the least intimidating and smallest possible information to the current knowledge. Thus, he proved that anything less would be impudent, anything that is more would be fatal in some (scientist), and anything that might tempt to discharge some of the assumption (in recent scientific research) is considered not serious work. Thus, Feynman said in one of his paper, stopped trying to keep up with the scientific literature or compete with other theorists at their own game, and went back to his roots, comparing experiment with theory, making guesses that were all his own... (Feynman, p. 186). By doing scientific researches, he became productive by working things out for himself of becoming one of the famous physicists in his generations.
   
The scientific discoveries of Feynman are an evident concern of the conceptual side of physics. The theory that he mentioned was a conceptual side of quantum mechanics with lot of confusion, calling it as incomprehensible idea. His lack of interest in philosophical question like the idea of ignorance comes from not having the freedom to doubt was not a valid idea. He meant that there was literally nothing to be done about this condition, except to expect what would come next in the field of science. It is a given fact that philosophical idea or theory is not common for him, like the existence of philosophical constants which is for him an irritation and an arbitrary concept. He is like ordinary physicists who are not happy if every constant of nature cannot be derived from some conceptually elegant circumstances.
   
In this sense, scientist may need to remember that the public interpretation of values and ethics needs justification and evidence, including any scientific discussions. Although ethical conclusions are based on general principles, not based on their own personal feelings, one must understand that this is still necessary. The willingness to experience the consequences of person actions and the ability to generalize the decision in very common ways is a test to whether principles are ethical or not. Thus, one philosopher said, a good touchstone of ethics is to aims at objectivity.

On the other hand, Feynman principles do not agree on this idealism. For him new ideas do not come from committees, researchers in many areas of science are blinded with their own herd of mentality. He reiterated that collectivist ideology and rent-seeking behavior are both judgment to others and in denial of it. Thus, of all the work and lesson of Richard Feynman biography, this ideology is considered to be the best.